https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161830
MarioMey <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #6 from MarioMey <[email protected]> --- (In reply to jcsanz from comment #5) > Created attachment 195044 [details] > Bug not reproducible > > The bug is NOT reprducible, as can see in the image all dates, "Created" > (Creado), "modified" (Modificado) and "accessed" (Último acceso) are as > expected. > I think it is not our bug but is an OS dependent one. Yes, you are right about "created date". There were some stuff and maybe one or both was causing the confusion (on me): - If you duplicate a file, the created date is the moment you duplicate it... but modified and accessed are not touched. So, paradoxically, it was modified before its creation! 😱 Well... I think this is the correct behavior of any OS. So, nothing to say about it. But, the most important and relevant thing is... - MY BAD! I realized that I'm using Syncthing in the folder where I have these files. So, when it sincronizes, Syncthing creates the files in my computer, not LO. I'm not really sure that Syncthing works like this, but I think it is a good hypothesis. Ok, LO doesn't change "created date" property. But why LO in you OS doesn't change "modified date" and in my and Robert's computers, it does? (Robert said in the other bug '"Created" is also untouched here. But "modified" and "accessed" are almost the same when LO has been closed (Connection to the database has been closed).'). I mean, this is a very unimportant issue... but it is the not correct behavior of managing files. As I say in my country: "te dejo la inquietud" - "I leave the restlessness" (?) Again, as this last behavior (modified/accessed date) is not serious at all, I close this report. Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
