https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161871
--- Comment #6 from TokieSan <[email protected]> --- I don't agree with the prefiltering part due to the same reason you proposed which is conscious, the decision to remove the usage & type columns were mainly to appeal to the most % of the use cases leaving the less used details in the "view certificate" dialog and back then we had a couple of meetings to decide on what to keep/remove. I think that for the usage part, usually in cases where two different keys used for encryption vs signing it gets added as a subkey (and thus in the UI both will have the same entry, but the subkey will be automatically used according to whether it's in encryption or signing) Also in cases for splitted certificates, a large margin of those usually include that usage part in the comment attribute of the certificate (since in other cert usage cases you are only seeing the comments) which is also viewed directly in the dialog The question is what % would the case the two keys are separate of the total usage cases (and it'll be frustrating not to have the usage columns) and view certificate dialog won't be enough. I agree that the dialog in case a sign only cert was used for encryption should include more information anyways rather than just "OpenPGP key not trusted, damaged, or encryption failure". These are my thoughts tho based on the earlier discussions we had and your comments, some details are maybe missing but maybe hossein can provide his input as well -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
