https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158504
Björn Michaelsen <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords|bibisected, bisected | --- Comment #8 from Björn Michaelsen <[email protected]> --- This bibisect from Comment 4 seems to be misleading: I just compiled 345b214c37d1f645dd0e6e084358f8ca81d9ed66 (which is the parent of 140079362502408c75ceee67e86d779f61c0ac1b) on Linux and the default page style does _not_ show up as an applied style. So 140079362502408c75ceee67e86d779f61c0ac1b is NOT causing this regression: it was there before. This might either be a heisenbug or it might have been a fumble in the bibisect in Comment 6: Given that with a 345b214c37d1f645dd0e6e084358f8ca81d9ed66 build on Linux this is not reproducible, the root cause has to be in 345b214c37d1f645dd0e6e084358f8ca81d9ed66 or in the commits before. Even given the cairo errors mentioned in Comment 4, maybe it is worthwhile to retry a bibisect. This could also be done on Linux with setting "SAL_USE_VCL_PLUGIN=gen" to avoid the cairo breakage. => Removing the bibisected/bisected keywords for that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
