https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161836
Stéphane Guillou (stragu) <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Blocks| |107450 Resolution|--- |NOTABUG CC| |stephane.guillou@libreoffic | |e.org --- Comment #7 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) <[email protected]> --- I also think this is not a but. - if you don't want a cell's formula to be shown, in what use case would you _also_ have other cells whose job is explicitly and exclusively to expose such formula? - why should a cell's setting propagate to other cells? I think this opens a can of worms. For example, what happens if the contents of cell D1 are then reused elsewhere with a TEXTJOIN() function? And is "#N/A" better than, say, an empty string? I am closing as "not a bug", but if you are not convinced, please feel free to ping the UX/Design team for more opinion. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107450 [Bug 107450] [META] Cell and sheet protection bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
