https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161765
Per99 <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |needsUXEval --- Comment #22 from Per99 <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Stéphane Guillou (stragu) from comment #21) > For "Miscellaneous", looks like other panels use "Other" instead. > So with new names and more logical order: > - Animations - High Contrast - Other It’s good with concise names. In the other options dialogues I didn’t find any “Other”, so keeping "Miscellaneous" could be an option? Aligning with the terminology of “Allow animated images”, I suggest “Allow other animations:” with the options “System”/”No”/”Yes”. Combining the phrase “Enable other animations” with the options “Disable” (and the rest), feels strange to me. As suggested by Stéphane, I reordered the options (and aligned the allowance terminology). Here’s the result: https://postimg.cc/gallery/RMCBbKC What do you think? Is this agreeable, or other ideas? (In reply to Stéphane Guillou (stragu) from comment #21) > Not sure how to best represent inheritance (or lack thereof) but I just > wanted to say that I support the use of the term "System" to clarify the > link with the OS and to be consistent with the View panel. > > While we're at it, I would suggest removing the "Options [for]" bits in the > headers. Short and to the point is best. We are in the Options dialog after > all. > For "Miscellaneous", looks like other panels use "Other" instead. > So with new names and more logical order: > > - Animations > - High Contrast > - Other > > What do you think? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
