https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117428
V Stuart Foote <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected], | |[email protected] --- Comment #27 from V Stuart Foote <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #26) > Repeating this question. Where does this stand? Also, should it really block > RTL-CTL? Implementing PDF /ActualText tagging (comment 3, comment 6) has not been picked up for dev effort, but remains a valid enhancement to quality/function of our PDF export. Especially so for the Complex Text Languages (CTL) [that *you* had tagged (bug 43808)], obviously less an issue for handling simple RTL scripts, but essential embedding text runs of the truly complex, e.g. the Indic scripts. [1] @Miklos, Tomaž -- have either of you looked through this? Khaled had done the initial work on the /ActualText structure in the PDF export filters, and commented on the merit of more complete text tagging within our PDF export. =-ref-= [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brahmic_scripts#Unicode_of_Brahmic_scripts -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
