https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159168
--- Comment #12 from Stéphane Guillou (stragu) <[email protected]> --- Created attachment 195466 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=195466&action=edit screencast showing results at bibisected commit and at commit~1 (In reply to Björn Michaelsen from comment #11) > Hmm, I tried this with a build of 7f85415a2f07d62bf688cb33680054940d4dd7f1 > and with reverting that commit. Why that commit? That wasn't the one this was bibisected to. But assuming that was a wrong copy-paste and you actually meant 140079362502408c75ceee67e86d779f61c0ac1b: > Both with and without that commit, I find that as long as no style is > applied, "applied styles" for character styles is empty. That's also what I see: (A) in comment 10, and has always been the case, related but not the regression that we see. > Once an character > style is used in the document (e.g. "emphasis"), _both_ that style and "no > character style" show up in "applied styles" for character styles. This is where we have different results, for some reason. See attached video. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
