https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161941
--- Comment #12 from Eyal Rozenberg <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Timur from comment #11) > IIUC there are 2 arguments agains: rarely used and Google sponsored. > Regardless if rarely, any metric compatible font is useful IMO. It is useful, but not meaningfully useful. Remember we used to bundle the Source fonts - which are quite useful; and we unbundled them, since they are not critically useful. > Font > replacement is significant weakness of LO in real world where majority > unfortunatelly uses MSO. This would not meaningfully help us with font replacement as MSO users do not get these fonts bundled with MSO, nor with MS Windows, nor with MacOS, nor with Linux. In fact, it would probably not _ever_ help us, relative to MSO. > Instead of discussing how to better replace other > common fonts, for example Aptos or Segoe family, here is discussed how to > step back. By this logic, we should bundle thousands of metrically-compatible fonts, to cover any font which has even a marginal frequency in users' documents. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
