https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119940
--- Comment #20 from Eyal Rozenberg <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Jonathan Clark from comment #19) > For a number of technical reasons, there will always be some judder when > rendering text in situations like this. I (and I assume Idan) would not consider that, in itself, a bug. But if you have some words judder or jitter, then a word that's almost stable, then again a word with significant judder - that is problematic. The noticeable non-monotonous behavior of judder as you look away from the original word. > but as a side effect it will cause a subtle but observable > pattern in subpixel movement if you do a test like the one you described. > Humans are very good at noticing patterns. > > What matters is what measurement shows. I'd say what matters is what humans notice. Also... I wonder what it's like in MS-Word. I'll go check. Hmm! Interesting! I (subjectively) notice less judder on Windows, with MS Word 2402 - but also with LibreOffice (24.02). Using Frank Ruehl CLM. Which platform did you use to diff the renderings? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
