https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146493
--- Comment #27 from Mike Kaganski <[email protected]> --- (In reply to sophie from comment #10) > (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #8) > > IMO this is a lot for sake of renaming itself, haven't met a user who > > actually struggles with the terms. > > I second your comment, I've never met a user confused by those strings too. > I don't see any benefit of renaming them. Note how bug 139107 advocates for inclusion of the non-printing characters *non-existing* in a given font into this dialog, *exactly because* the name of the function does not imply the connection to all the *font's* characters, but instead talks about some "special characters". IMO, this needs revisiting. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
