https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65169
--- Comment #3 from Ruslan Kabatsayev <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #1) > I don't think a single character is ever going to be a good candidate for a > formula frame (or any frame really). I appreciate that you are trying to > write 𝛿-function (in Cyrillic script) but why not just use the Mathematical > Italic Small Delta (U+1D6FF) as show here and in your description? This > would seem to be the appropriate (text) form of use, as delta by itself is > not really a formula. Well. It seems you consider anything what can be typeset with Unicode to be not a formula. But: 1. Searching character map (or learning unicode numbers by heart) is counter-productive when you could get your task done by using equation editor. 2. Even fractions and multiple powers can be typeset without equation editor, but why would one bother when there exists an equation editor? 3. What if you get a Word document which has such equations (which do work correctly in Word), and you have to open it with LibO? > Do you have a better example where a formula needs to be set in close > contact with text? I'll have to think harder to find something which fits your demand, since fractions and powers also won't be good enough. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
