https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=162872
V Stuart Foote <vsfo...@libreoffice.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
See Also| |https://bugs.documentfounda
| |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13
| |6604,
| |https://bugs.documentfounda
| |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15
| |9950
Blocks| |161389
Keywords| |needsUXEval
CC| |kha...@libreoffice.org,
| |libreoffice-ux-advise@lists
| |.freedesktop.org,
| |vsfo...@libreoffice.org
--- Comment #1 from V Stuart Foote <vsfo...@libreoffice.org> ---
Maybe.
But how useful would this really be? The example presentation is just Aptos
normal--and yes the Source Sans Pro at least is close in metrics in width if
not the height/leading. Does that hold though with Aptos light, semi-bold,
bold, extra-bold, black and their italic rendering. And, what of Aptos's other
faces? Narrow, Serif, Display and Mono...
If we had the Aptos fallback hardcoded would we then be well served/forced to
restore bundling of Source Sans Pro (dropped for bug 136604, though restored to
CO)?
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161389
[Bug 161389] [META] Font fallback-list issues
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
