https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105112
--- Comment #18 from Mike Kaganski <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Julien Nabet from comment #17) > Perhaps we may add a function isFunctionSupported(<functionName>) in > XDatabaseMetaData2 (which isn't published if I don't misunderstand > https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/offapi/com/sun/star/sdbc/ > XDatabaseMetaData2.idl?r=5687eba4) ? Yes it's not published; but even if it were, we could introduce XDatabaseMetaData3, and do it there. There's no problem in adding new derived interfaces. > I'm not an expert but I imagine this plan once the function is added in > XDatabaseMetaData2: > - every DB driver should include XDatabaseMetaData2 in addition to > XDatabaseMetaData > - implements isFunctionSupported > - use of isFunctionSupported It could be tested, if the driver supports the interface, in the usual way; and *if it does*, fine-tune the existing behavior accordingly. It's a reasonable plan, please feel free to work on that, if you feel line that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
