https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160580

--- Comment #22 from Mike Kaganski <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to ady from comment #21)
> Talking about the specific issue (not as a general concept), the request in
> tdf#156311 should had been optional, not imposed to everyone. It was not
> _that_ hard to imagine that the change of behavior would not be welcome by
> many users (myself included), and the reports about it were almost immediate.

Reading bug 156311 comment 2, I realize that you were one of the first to
answer there. And two more comments there. And in all of them, I see no sign of
a warning that this is not what you want (i.e., that there are use cases that
need the old behavior). Only some terminology discussion and mention of
inconsistencies in OSes.

The *creator* of an enhancement request is *never* expected to "make their
requests optional". The author wants *their* problem fixed; it's not their task
to think about others.

And speaking about others: of course, there *are* cases when it's easy to
imagine the other use cases. And I tell you, that most people are so cool that
they can predict 100% of the problems that this change would bring ... in the
hindsight.

But almost always, when I raise my voice in bugs where I feel that the current
behavior must be kept (maybe optionally), I see *many* people not understanding
what seems obvious to me. So - no, it's NOT "not _that_ hard". What was really
not _that_ hard is to realize that your tone (from start here) is not OK, and
your posts imply that others have no right for a mistake.

Again: the project favors rapid changes, and relies on *users feedback* to
learn, iteratively improving. It is *reasonable* to assume that any change
should be unconditional, unless there is a good reason to believe otherwise. It
is OK to introduce behavior change, and it will pay off, if it turns out
uncontroversial; and if it turns out needing the configuration, it's something
we will now know for sure, because users told that.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to