https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163468
--- Comment #19 from Eyal Rozenberg <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Michael Weghorn from comment #18) > Making code more robust is of course always a good idea. The bigger > challenge is probably to decide what to spend the (limited) resources (here > in particular developer time) on. Fair enough. But I would say it's worthwhile to invest in preventing crashes. Too bad I wasn't able to focus us more. > Looking into Desktop::Init, I see a call to `InitApplicationServiceManager` > a few lines above the ones you mention. As I said, I'm not very familiar > with that area of LO code, but my "gut feeling" is that something might go > wrong there, and then the call to > `officecfg::Setup::Office::OfficeRestartInProgress::get` failing is just a > consequence of that. Well, I guess we'll leave it at that for now. > What might be most useful to get more insights could be to debug + compare > what happens in the broken case and a working setup. If the broken setup is > going away altogether, that probably makes this less actionable. The broken setup was: 1. Install Q4OS 5.5r1 32-bit 2. Use the "Profiler" utility to install the "full" distribution 2. Try to run LibreOffice from a comand-line that's it. Although maybe I should mention the hardware: LG X130 sub-notebook computer: https://gadgetaz.com/Netbook/LG_X130--3140 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
