https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163745
--- Comment #1 from Mike Kaganski <[email protected]> --- It would be nice, if both Return Value, and Parameters, were table; the return value could be the last row of that table, with the "name" like [return value]. The "Type" column would only contain the proper Basic type; and the last column would describe the element: e.g., for "return value", part of the text could be moved from above, like > Name Type Description > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > oTest Object the Basic Uno object that you want to test. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Uno-Interface-Name 1, String Uno interface name(s) > Uno-Interface-Name 2, > ... > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > [Return value] Boolean True, if all stated Uno interfaces are > supported, otherwise False Note that current text at "oTest", mentioning "the Basic Uno object" in a free-text description, is not a proper API-documentation-style type definition. It is OK to have that description, but it doesn't replace the formal type name of the language. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
