https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163809
--- Comment #8 from Buovjaga <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #7) > (In reply to Buovjaga from comment #6) > > No it's not, it's disabled. > > There is no such thing as a "disabled outline". When rendering text, it > either has an outline, or it doesn't; it can't have a "disabled outline". > Outline is a feature of non-embossed and non-engraved text. At least - > that's how things stand now w.r.t. LO behavior. > > If you believe it's important for the state of outline to be persisted for > when the user switches back - I might not object to that, but you could > still not show it as a checked boxed in the UI. You could hide the entire UI > for Outline; or alternatively, display something other than a check box > (perhaps there's a third, null state?) I would not oppose that I suppose. > But not the current state of affairs. Sure, but there are such things as an option vs. a disabled option. What you are proposing will have an effect on potentially hundreds of locations in the UI. That's why this needs research and discussion. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
