https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105112
--- Comment #24 from Julien Nabet <[email protected]> --- Rethinking about this, doing an UNION means: - we don't respect getFunctions from JDBC (not very clean but perhaps we may consider this ok if there wasn't the second point below) - it can work with Firebird, HSQLDB but what do put in the UNION with ODBC and JDBC since these are just middle men and we don't know what's the real database used I also thought about testing each keyword with a select. If it gives an exception, the DB doesn't know the keyword. The pb is there's no generic SQL to make these tests so again it can't work with ODBC and JDBC. In brief, the commits I pushed just allowed to synchro LO interface with last JDBC standards + begin to implement the added functions for Firebird. But it won't help for this bugtracker and have no idea what to do here. (and so I think we should remove the target 25.2.0 in Whiteboard) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
