https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=163119

--- Comment #6 from Buovjaga <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to Michael Weghorn from comment #5)
> (In reply to Michael Weghorn from comment #4)
> > In my experience, Qt code reviews usually happen within a reasonable time
> > frame (often within a few days, otherwise weeks). So now that there's a
> > pending fix in Gerrit (Qt's code review system), I'm fairly optimistic it
> > will get fixed upstream somewhat soon. (But you'll only profit from that
> > once a new enough Qt version containing the fix was released and is provided
> > by your Linux distro.)
> 
> FYI: The change for the current development version (to become Qt 6.10 one
> day) has been approved and merged now, backports for 6.9 and 6.8 should
> follow soon, once the CI runs have succeeded.

Thanks, Michael. We would be in a much worse place without your dedication.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to