https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=164862

--- Comment #8 from [email protected] ---
> 1. You are wrong when requiring me to do the quoting differently - you only 
> would be correct if the context wasn't readily available right here. It is a 
> single thread, not a different scientific paper, where finding the source of 
> the quote would require a separate research.

You literally changed the meaning of what I said when you misquoted me.  The
fact that you won't take responsibility for your inappropriate conduct or even
offer a simple apology tells us all much about you and your lack of integrity.

> 2. I specifically designed my phrase to make it clear what I strongly
> suspect to be the real cause. It worked as intended, you understood it
> correctly. In practice, people who tend to edit registry, use different
> registry cleaners, etc., often break the registry structure; and the problem
> may not be immediate edit of the *keys in question* - sometimes a previous
> such edit / cleanup somewhere else could break enough to disallow correct
> setting of the data here. I still am not convinced that it wasn't your
> (previous) registry edits that caused this.

You keep barking up the wrong tree.  What you "strongly suspect" is
nonsensical.  I never touched anything in the registry.  I'm skilled enough to
do so without breaking anything, but I didn't make even a single change (nor
did I state I did).  You also for some odd reason mentioned registry cleaners. 
I don't use one, and never mentioned that I did.

> 3. Given how boldly you claimed your idea of the "actual cause" of the 
> problem ("The reason is because soffice.exe is specified in the Windows 
> registry for each action for the file type" in comment 2 - I admit that in 
> comment 0, you used the "perhaps", but not later), why do you require others 
> to state their assumptions less firmly?

The reason I know that's the cause is because that's the source from where
Windows is obtaining the pointer to the icons.  The rest of your comment I will
ignore as I'm not going to waste my time on your pathetic attempt to provoke.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to