https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=166131
Justin L <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|7.0.0.3 release |Inherited From OOo Keywords|bibisectRequest |bibisected, bisected --- Comment #5 from Justin L <[email protected]> --- One key for Denis is "keep with next paragraph". This is the property that is set in your big table's "Text Flow" properties - and I doubt that you really want to keep that multi-page table connected to the following (empty) paragraph. [However, that doesn't solve the problem...] The big question (in regards to regression) is what did it do in LO 5.1 before all of my messing around. And the answer to that question is that basically, it looks the same as today. How about after my initial changes? (I look at 5.4). In that case, although the content isn't overlapping, it is "hidden at the bottom of the page". Basically, it looks like a table-in-table can't span pages. Additionally, the table has split so that the first two rows are on page 4, and the table-in-table row starts on page 5. So that isn't right either. So now lets go to 7.0 before my commit. Basically the same as 5.4. And after my commit we are back to basically the same as 5.1. Now the table-in-table is again splitting across pages (good), but not all of the rows are being pushed out to a new page. (I notice a slight delay when I get to that page before it is displayed, so it is probably hitting a layout loop.) So, definitely a layout bug. But not a regression. (I reproduced the same result in OOO 3.3) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
