https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=166012
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Clark <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #10) > (In reply to Jonathan Clark from comment #8) > > No, I don't; the documented intention for style:script-type is to help > > resolve ambiguity in the existing heuristic for characters which do not > > conclusively belong to a particular script category. It should not override > > the heuristic entirely, and is not a substitute for features that do. > > Do you mean, not override the heuristics for strong characters, or not > override the heuristics for weak characters as well? Sorry for nitpicking > the semantics of what you're saying, I want to be 100% I'm on the same page > with you about this. (And other people are definitely finding it difficult > to be on the same page, it is quite confusing for those who don't have the > script-assignment-related bugs on the top of their minds.) No problem. To a large extent, this issue is due to LO implementation details. It's more difficult to explain without a common understanding of those details. The ODF specification assigns certain Unicode code point ranges to Latin, Asian, or Complex (ODF 1.3 Table 22). Many code points are left unassigned; for these, handling is *implementation-defined*. style:script-type should only apply to these *implementation-defined* code points. It should not affect code points that are explicitly specified in the standard. --- This behavior differs from other proposals involving explicit language/script settings, which should override handling of all code points. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
