https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57202
--- Comment #14 from Mike Kaganski <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Yuri from comment #7) > To me it's pretty clear and obvious that it's a bug. (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #11) > This is definitely not a bug, since e.g. in MS Excel, there is an *option* > named "Scale with document" (*enabled by default*); so definitely there is a > use case for the current implementation as well. However, the lack of a > similar option in Calc is an *interoperability* bug, and a missing feature. (In reply to Yuri from comment #12) > Stating that an interoperability -bug- is "not a bug" looks contradictory: > how a type of bug is not a bug? Taking a phrase out of context is a proven way to win opponents. You - yourself - have stated, that the mere fact of scaling of headers and footers was a bug. It was not, and I proved it by demonstrating the evidence that some people need the behavior that you considered buggy, so much that another software implemented it, too, and made it the default. The bug that I claimed to exist was not that Calc scales. The bug is the absence of an option. And that is the big difference. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
