https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=167021
--- Comment #2 from Mike Kaganski <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Volga from comment #0) > I've seen a news that Rocky Linux added support for RISC-V architecture, > since then, it's reasonable to provide RISC-V builds as well. Even with adjusted title, the request completely lacks any reasoning. "I've seen someone did something; therefore, it suddenly became reasonable for TDF to spend substantial resources to providing packages for a particular architecture (but not others)". Why? What that event means from the point of view of user demand for TDF-built packages (as opposed to distro-provided ones, which are the officially preferred method [1])? What does Rocky Linux has to do with that? What is the analysis that requires providing for exactly that architecture? [1] https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/install-howto/linux/ : "As a general rule, you are advised to install LibreOffice via the installation methods recommended by your particular Linux distribution" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
