https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=164043

--- Comment #14 from Dennis Roczek <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to bugzilla2 from comment #12)
> As "V Stuart Foote" explained already, mixing two different
> installer-technologies is ... not the best ... idea :D
> 
> So, in the long term, moving away from MAR to an MSP-based (MSI Patch)
> approach would be welcome. And Yes I know, that would make a lot of time
> invested into the MAR thing obsolete :(
> 
> Of course you could also move away from MSI for Installation at all. But
> then Businesses will go nuts, because many rely on MSI-Packages for
> Application roll-out and -update.

In this case I would wait without investing too much time on this ticket,
because MS announced recently the opening of Windows Update for 3rd-party
software. I still remember their (MS Win Core team) long explanation to the
start of Win10 why they believe, that providing any auto uodater base is a bad
idea... 😂

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to