https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=167145
--- Comment #5 from Mike Kaganski <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #4) > (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #3) > > It is. Providing such an option, we provide an option to create unstable > > documents. > > You mean, like plain markdown (bug 160734), HTML, RTF, and other formats we > support saving to? No, I mean, like ODF, which is not plain markdown, HTML, RTF, and other formats that may have *their own* specifications and limitations. ODF has specific feature set. If you want, you may create a new file format, and make it "have no promise of being stable". Saving to that, you could strip out whatever you like. Again: your personal deep knowledge and reasonable expectation from this stripped out variant is NOT a reason to provoke users who have no idea what the inner differences are, to say "wow it's three times slimmer, and work the same - let me use this, and suggest this new shiny setting in all forums I can reach, and make myself and countless of others suffer tomorrow, when the program changes its defaults". There is ~0 upside in your proposal. But it is a HUGE danger. It simply must not be done. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
