https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=167125
Michael Weghorn <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |NEW --- Comment #6 from Michael Weghorn <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #5) > Correct (despite the question came up whether VT are accessible) I've taken a look at that a while ago (when VT was enabled earlier) and improved a11y a little, but then didn't look too closely when the decision was to not switch to VT further back then. I can take another look before the 26.2 release, but IIRC, things seemed quite OK in general. > > Why do you expect different behavior for vertical and horizontal tabs? > Well, first of all it is a question. I guess the look and feel like a list > triggered my expectation. I'm happy to not modify all ui again. ;-) I currently don't see a reason to distinguish between horizontal and vertical tabs when it comes to accelerators. (Both, GTK and Qt allow setting accelerators for horizontal tabs. And FWIW, Qt doesn't support vertical tabs with horizontal labels at the moment, s. https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-22488, but would use the same QTabWidget for vertical tabs with vertical labels, just like GTK uses the same widget for horizontal and vertical tabs.) In my opinion, having accelerators would be a "nice to have" for both, but not a blocker to not have them. For switching between tabs, I'd personally rather rely on having Ctrl+Tab work to cycle between the existing tabs (which seems to work in a quick test with horizontal tabs, but not vertical ones - tested using the "Format" -> "Character" dialog with qt6 in current master and a version before it was switched to VT). > (In reply to Michael Weghorn from comment #4) > > ...mnemonics seem to work just fine with gtk3... > True, but not with kf6 and gen. Thanks, that answers my "Is this ticket only about the VCL/non-GTK version?" question. (It wasn't so clear to me from the initial description that this was about non-GTK only.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
