https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=168143

--- Comment #4 from Mike Kaganski <[email protected]> ---
>From IRC:

> _rene_: mikekaganski: the problem is thst people forced othe people to
          use 4.0.. i saud thst to our firebird maintainer back then...
> _rene_: mikekaganski: and that lo relues on an old version. but that
          problem will maybe exist on 4.0 vs. 5.0 too :/
> mikekaganski: _rene_: my question is: what could be a problem, if we
          always bundle our own build of FB embedded .so, irrespective of
          the system FB?
> _rene_: for hsqldb i keep hsqldb1.8.0 around fir infinity for this reason,
          but i am nit the firebird maintainer...
> _rene_: mikekaganski: that it's a bundlee version and that should be
          avoided in principle if posdible
> _rene_: and then there is the problem of srchitecture support
> mikekaganski: _rene_: the "if possible" is the problem :-) I understan
          why it is undesirable in general; my question is about a specific
          situation, that has its root in how FB handles its file versions
> _rene_: are you going to fix any arch? by using it from the systfm you
          relay that to firebird ;)
> _rene_: https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=libreoffice. ignore
          mios64el and i am not sure about s390x
> _rene_: but loong64 will come sooner or later
> mikekaganski sees the last argument, it's really critical
> noel_grandin: maybe just disable firebird if the system version is wrong?
> _rene_: besides that the white ones need to work (or firebird disabled...)
> _rene_: and have no internal db at all?
> _rene_: there is archs where hsqldb is disabled too
> _rene_: because java is disabled bevause either not ecisting or broken
> _rene_: of the archs above, only a subset has java support
> _rene_: ure-java   | 4:25.8.0-1            | unstable                   | 
> amd64, arm64, i386, riscv64
> _rene_: mikekaganski: this is a mess. i'd have preferrred out firebird
          mainer keeping a 3.0 -dev, but he didn't
> _rene_: and libfbembed2 from 4.0 needs 4.0-server-core
> _rene_: so i was forced to built agaimst 4.0 without resorting to the
          internal one :/
> _rene_: *if* one forces internal fb
> _rene_: we need a --disable/--without switch. then people might get no
          internal db tbough. no hsqldb, no fb
> _rene_: :-(
> _rene_: mikekaganski: ftr, 
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2025/01/thrd2.html.
          look for firebird

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to