https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=167897
--- Comment #25 from Xisco Faulí <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Samuel Mehrbrodt from comment #24) > (In reply to Xisco Faulí from comment #22) > > Regression introduced by > > > > commit 22c07826d77adf93ada6e17ed6ac531163dd5059 [log] > > author Samuel Mehrbrodt <[email protected]> Thu Feb > > 13 09:55:04 > > 2025 +0100 > > committer Samuel Mehrbrodt <[email protected]> Thu Feb > > 13 > > 12:03:19 2025 +0100 > > tree 3fe35f67429c1c675c2ef5e582f463fdd1ec131a > > parent 49407a8723574f93cf07b807fa536b254da5db61 [diff] > > > > tdf#165228 Don't reuse previous path in save dialog > > > > @Samuel, now that > > > > commit 3fa39a4dadc8e2777185465a6f7c9968c8cf44d1 [log] > > author Samuel Mehrbrodt <[email protected]> Fri Apr > > 11 18:21:37 > > 2025 +0200 > > committer Samuel Mehrbrodt <[email protected]> Sat Apr > > 12 > > 08:15:55 2025 +0200 > > tree d1c47e62030959ff4ddfb672810c6b291fa74546 > > parent 7fac8458e35620b9855cc6c68a9675159a849b65 [diff] > > > > tdf#165917 Improve Export directory pre-selection > > > > is in place, would it make sense to revert > > 22c07826d77adf93ada6e17ed6ac531163dd5059 in order to fix this issue? > > Sure, can you test that after reverting bug 165228 does not reappear? > If that's the case, go ahead with reverting it. Hi Samuel, If I revert it, then bug 165228 reappears... the question is, what should be the expected behaviour? Reading the comment in this bug and in bug 165228, and also considering that 22c07826d77adf93ada6e17ed6ac531163dd5059 was reverted in previous releases branches, I'm in behaviour of reverting it in master and libreoffice-25-8 so it's not breaking the users' workflow for the time being -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
