https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=168771
--- Comment #2 from Hossein <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Stephan Bergmann from comment #1) > (In reply to Hossein from comment #0) > > [...] lack > > of ability to define the underlying data type [...] are > > some of the problems with plain enum that enum class solves. > (that's not quite accurate, the underlying type can be explicitly specified > also for unscoped enumerations, since C++ 11) Thanks Stephan for the above note. I clarify that before C++11 one could not specify the underlying type in enum, but since C++11 it is possible. Beyond that, there are still many reasons to use 'enum class' instead of 'enum' in new enumerations. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
