https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146790

--- Comment #12 from ady <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to ady from comment #8)
> (In reply to Eike Rathke from comment #7)
> > What actually is the problem? 
> 
> STR:
> 1. Open attachment 177583 [details] from comment 2
> 2. [CTRL]+[SHIFT]+[F9] repeatedly until some numeric values in column D have
> their background color changed according to their conditional format.
> 
> Step 2 might take several tries, but it will happen eventually.
> 
> The BG color in column D shows repeating values, which in theory would only
> happen when there are repeating values in column A too, but it is clearly
> not always the case in attachment 177583 [details]. Thus, it would hint at
> some problem in COUNTIF().
> 
> I tried replicating the same situation with column A being integers (instead
> of [0...1], and it was clearly less likely to happen. So, is this because
> natural accuracy issues? IDK. (FWIW, bug 151958, also related to COUNTIF()
> doesn't seem to be related to accuracy.)


With a Dev version of LO 25.2 (Build ID:
341f3618866c622fa511f153a1b48621e04ddd17) I was (am) still able to clearly
replicate the problematic behavior (10's of Hard Recalculate would be enough).

With a Dev version of LO 26.8 dated 2025-12-19 – there is currently no relevant
Build ID in LO Dev for Windows in the Version Info – after a 100 of Hard
Recalculate, I have not seen the same problematic behavior. Although this does
not completely prove that the problem is really solved, it is at least a hint
of a possible improvement.

Unfortunately, LO Dev 26.8 does not allow me to use the exact same Options that
I used with LO Dev 25.2 (e.g. Render is stuck at Skia, instead of "default"),
so the comparison is less than ideal.

Having said that, at the time I am writing this comment, there are still bugs
with COUNTIF() and COUNTIFS() (and some of them are currently being resolved
after several years of the initial reports).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to