https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145739
--- Comment #9 from Heiko Tietze <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Telesto from comment #8) > A) The table width should be below the table name (as currently). The default alignment option sets the table width at 100% of the parent. Before you configure anything about the width you need to change the alignment. Second argument to move the total width down is to have it together with the column widths. > B) The absolute/relative gets way to much focus... Which again defines what you enter: either a width of 50% of the page size with 25% spacing left and right, if alignment is Center, and column width at 10%. Such a table definition might become handy when changing the page orientation. > C) Regarding to column width: is only absolute allowed or maybe also > relative sizes? The idea would be to set column width in percent in case of a "(o) Relative" position/size, of course. > D) The part Left/Right between round brackets after From Start/From End > appears to defying the purpose of using 'Start' and 'End', I think. > E) Is Left/Right for spacing correct label for RTL language; so rather > neutral? A while ago we considered this "Start (Left)" vs "Start (Right)" annotation for users who might struggle with Start when looking for left alignment. I think this has been rejected meanwhile and we go with just Start/End. As for the spacing I'd keep Left and Right but no strong opinion here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
