https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54908
--- Comment #7 from [email protected] --- Not really familiar with "bibisect" (even after doing a Google search) :) I mean, this is still a valid bug report, even if it originally came from AOO, right? Should I or others be reporting it differently? I see what you mean with the word "regression", I am probably using/overusing that word and in a way not typical by developers. To me (and most) it is really the same as a just a bug, usually a break or poorer behavior in something that used to be stable/functional, where a bug could be in a new feature. Thanks! From: [email protected] To: [email protected] Subject: [Bug 54908] printing when a selection is active should take in account it and activate the "print selection" radio button Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 19:47:57 +0000 Comment # 6 on bug 54908 from Joel Madero I always hate to call these our regressions as really it seems like a regression in AOO and we just ended up with the broken code .... hm - well no bibisect will be useful if it came from AOO code base unfortunately You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
