https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159426
Buovjaga <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC| |ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoff | |ice.org --- Comment #1 from Buovjaga <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Klaus Frank from comment #0) > (the "language" of these data source functions could be an extended version > of what we have currently with the normal versions but extended to a "full" > functional language. Mainly because that is probably the simplest way to > implement it. Alternatively something like a full > Scala/Lua/TypeScript/Haskell/F#/... support would also be nice, but esp. the > later ones are probably way more difficult to integrate. Especially because > most of the utility value of these languages would either vanish when ran > within such a restricted environment or add way too much complexity to get > it working to begin with.) Basic Lua bindings were already added in 2024: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/GSoC/Successfully_Implemented_Ideas#LUA_UNO_Language_Binding ...and now Neil is working on what I believe to be more extensive support: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/202950 Neil will continue to improve the scripting/API/SDK features from now on: https://blog.documentfoundation.org/blog/2026/03/29/say-hello-to-neil-roberts-new-libreoffice-developer-focusing-on-scripting-support/ Additionally of interest to you as you talk about data sources and databases: our new database developer will start working tomorrow. Maybe you should look into experimenting with the new Lua support when it is committed, what do you think? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
