https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40917
--- Comment #41 from ady <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Kyle Marek from comment #40) > I'd definitely rather have the feature work under Xvnc even if there are > performance issues than not have it work at all. > > I'm not necessarily saying to not take advantage of GPU acceleration when > you can, but rather that I don't want the lack thereof to limit the > software. If trying to minimize perceived performance issues, please at the > very least allow users to choose to go to the advanced settings and forcibly > enable scrolling by pixel in unaccelerated environments. I don't want to pay the (performance) price for something that I don't need, even if I had the adequate hardware. I'd rather leave my very limited resources available for things that actually impact my work. I understand that other users might need pixel-by-pixel scrolling / movements, so I am not against the potential implementation of it, but in my case I'd rather see that (not-yet-implemented) possibility as an optional (not the default), no matter the hardware, instead of forcibly changing the current default behavior (i.e. cell-by-cell scrolling) towards something that requires more resources. Needs, desires and resources are not always the same for everyone. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
