https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171348
V Stuart Foote <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected], | |[email protected] See Also| |https://bugs.documentfounda | |tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16 | |4225 --- Comment #8 from V Stuart Foote <[email protected]> --- Need info from @Danat, is his install to C:\Program Files or on a different system path? Bcz IIRC (from what Stephan B. had commented on in bug 164757) to support non-Admin users and an installation to typical default C:\Program Files\ path, the MSI installs lay down the update_service.exe and that should avoid UAC trigger of update.exe. Allowing the MAR like updates without user action--admin or non-admin. Bcz even admin users may be subject to UAC. And, to me at least, it seems Win11 has tightened up things with Smart App control. And, IIUC for bug 164225 other install paths would not receive the UAC preventing update_service.exe Service--and all runs of update.exe could be subject to UAC (meaning probably always non-Admin users). I've cc'd Stephan B. and Mike K. they might have a moment to comment on the correctness of UAC response on Windows, or if the Smart App Control of Win11 is now more of an issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
