https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=171940
--- Comment #4 from Callegar <[email protected]> --- You are right, the size is recognized as "Widescreen". I tested with a new presentation from Powerpoint and it works. The problem was with a presentation that I received on which they probably messed the size (maybe they changed it and then tried to change it back incorrectly). The second part of the problem remains, though: the names are quite hard to associate to what they are employed for: - Screen 4:3, Screen 16:9, Screen 16:10 - On-Screen Show (4:3), On-Screen Show (16:9) - Widescreen It is a bit problematic to expect that a random user can associate: the first ones with the LibO sizes; the second group with the sizes for compatibility with (legacy) powerpoint and for google document presentations; the last one with compatibility with newer powerpoint and that it is a 16:9 format. Wouldn't it be nice to rename them to *always* indicate the form factor and to mark the "compatible" and "native" formats as such? Furthermore, a "native" slide size that is 16:9 or 16:10, derived from Screen 4:3 but larger than it (i.e., obtained from it by making it wider rather than shorter — same relationship that exists among On-Screen Show (4:3) and Widescreen) is still missing and would be quite useful to import stuff originally developed for 4:3 slides into 16:9 slides. Can these last changes still be considered from this issue or would it be better to pen a new wishlist bug just for those? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
