https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=166641
--- Comment #7 from Heiko Tietze <[email protected]> --- (In reply to John Mills from comment #4) > rename Character to Font? Not a fan - we always talk about Character vs. Paragraph. But since Stuart also wanted this it is 2:1 > Does Insert and View catergories need to be in the Home tab No to "need". Guess it was added foe convenience. Somewhat off-topic here but +1. > Wouldn't it be better to make the Styles widget larger if we can do? The Styles widget scales with the window size. > Insert > Can we have the insert tables functionality added here like in MSO? There is a Insert Table button. If you talk about fancy styles, OT here. > Is there any scope for having a "Help" tab OT here > quick toggle in the "View" tab for dark and light mode There is the darkmode on/off control but AFAIK hidden on Linux. (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #5) > * Italicizing the labels is not useful. Trying to separate the category labels from the commands. The font size is 90% (80% is too small on Windows) and italic. I'd like to get more opinions on this. > * MS Office leaves a generous padding YMMV - it has much more space on gtk3. > * "Find and Replace" does not fit in a "New" section. OT here > * The "Style" section...should we not call it "Paragraph Style" Don't like that it would then replicate the previous "Paragraph". > * Inserting media does not fit into a "Graphic"-labeled section. > * "Page Numbers" is not that much of a tools. But - ok, I can live with it. > * The "References" tab has a "References" section. Problematic. > * "Footnote" and "Endnote" are not references. > * "Data Sources" and "Bibliographic Database" don't fit well... Propose an alternative. > * The "Accept Changes" section could just as well be named "Reject Changes" > - and both names ignore the other aspect. Perhaps "Change Actions"? Hmmm. Response? I still like "Accept Changes" more. > * The Image tab "Tools" section - with commands for changing contrast and > brightness etc. - seems too vague of a choice of name. Maybe "Adjust" or > "Adjustment"? Adjust or Modify... sounds good to me. (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #6) > Will you be doing similar for NB Grouped and Grouped Compact UI assemblages? Nope, it is tedious grunt work and easy hackable for every volunteer. Plus, the other variants seem to me kind of doomed in the long run. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
