https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=166275
--- Comment #6 from Robert Lacroix <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #5) > -1 to stacked rows of sheet tabs > > How about using the Navigator? I tried the Navigator per your suggestion, but it buys be nothing at the cost of 3 or 4 more clicks per use. I see it has value for long tab names but all my tab names are only 3 or 4 characters long so I already have 35 tabs visible at once. I can see all 71 tabs if I stretch the page across 2 monitors or use a 4K monitor, but I prefer to use the spreadsheet on only half my screen space. Let's face it, I have to agree with you on this one. This feature would look great and speed up my use case a wee bit, at great development cost for LO-Calc. But my use case repeats the same formulas in every sheet so a database would be far less onerous to maintain for my application. That's the thing about spreadsheets - they're cute when the data set is small, but it locks you into spending more and more time maintaining the same design when the data set grows large. If someone has many sheets with long names and different sets of formulas on each sheet, then this enhancement has potential value. The water resource engineers I work with tend to have Excel workbooks like that. But no one has declared here that their spreadsheet looks like this. My spreadsheet is large and complex with over 1700 rows of data and formulas across all the sheets, but at least the layout is repetitive with each sheet having 9 columns of data, 27 columns of formulas, and a pivot table. The OP made a one-line claim in his description without saying much. That's not enough to make a decision on. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
