https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=173235
--- Comment #2 from Eyal Rozenberg <[email protected]> --- (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #1) > However, the .bin is required as on Windows there is both an executable .exe > *and* a .bin with the same root--the executable a wrapper that calls the > binary. But the binary does all the lifting (and is also the target for > WinDbg analysis). You'll notice that I listed options with the .bin and without the .bin . Also - most other applications don't need to have a separate wrapper executable and another .bin-equivalent file - AFAICT. But - that would be a different request. For now, let's just drop the soffice part. Also, on Linux, one definitely does not need the `.bin` filename suffix. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
