https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=172591
--- Comment #2 from Alberto Dietze <[email protected]> --- (In reply to BogdanB from comment #1) > See also > https://ask.libreoffice.org/t/installing-and-running-multiple-versions-of- > libreoffice-on-linux/29337 Thanks BogdanB, but I dont really see relationship with the topic. Im underlining that from the "official source", I should be able to download the software, upgrading it. We use the .deb packaging to allow users to simply download install/update their software. Instead, even if from "same source", when users use the .deb files, they find out to have multiple different versions. The entire industry follows the standard of "updating" an existing package, without duplicating the software; we follow the RHEL baselines, but? We produce deb/rpm packages that install different copies of the software? ... It is kind a no-sense. Im kindly raising the point of normalize the installation/update process of deb/rpm packages. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
