https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=168986
--- Comment #7 from Regina Henschel <[email protected]> --- The example file does not use a textbox but a custom shape. To have a constant corner radius it would need an own geometry definition beyond those that are compatible to Microsoft Office. That is possible, it would be a shape type "non-primitive" in ODF and a `custGeom` in OOXML. The problem would not exist, if a true textbox were used. (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #6) > Obviously I was wrong - text boxes may have a corner radius. And the drawing > style misses the slant/corner radius attributes. > > (In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #1) > > `draw:corner-radius` of <draw:text-box> element is an attribute of an > > individual text box, not a property in a style. A graphic style has nothing > > suitable for corner-radius. That means, that implementing a corner radius as > > style property requires extended namespace. > ...or to update the standard. > > I could imagine another modifier key similar to shift that keeps the value > constant. Until the style allows to set this parameter. The corner radius defines the geometry not a style. I'm sure, that the standard will not be changed in this regard. I would solve "fixed radius" in the UI, so that when changing the size of the shape a new internal value for the adjustment handle is automatically calculated, that results in an unchanged visual radius. In case of a custom shape, we have already the "Control Point" in the Position&Size dialog in a way, that it is measured as visual distance. Thus an internal calculation from visual distance to internal adjustment value already exists. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
