https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=174007
--- Comment #4 from Eyal Rozenberg <[email protected]> --- I support changing the label to "Edit Field", with no other change. (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #1) > the buttons in the field edit dialog that allow to go to > "Next/Previous field of same type".... we also have to drop these two... I don't think so. It's good that the dialog allows you to switch to a different field; and that does not mean the likely original intent was to edit multiple fields. Think about what happens when you double-click a footnote or endnote reference: You are taken to the footnotes area, where you can then easily move to the next or previous footnote. The context menu for the references still says "Footnote or Endnote..." - not "Footnotes or Endnotes..." And now for a couple of procedural comments: (In reply to BogdanB from comment #0) > Steps to Reproduce: > - You put the STR in the description instead of in the STR section... > Expected Results: > - As you probably know from doing QA yourself, it helps when reports stick to the proposed sectioning scheme with STR, actual and expected. For example here, noticing the rest of the comments made me confused about what you were actually asking for until I read the whole thing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
