https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56015
--- Comment #8 from Cesar Eduardo Barros <ces...@cesarb.eti.br> --- The plot thickens: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14699 This means that, with recent enough glibc, NAME_MAX+1 will be enough, even if a fuse filesystem decides to return a longer filename (glibc will manufacture an error instead of overflowing in that case). That is, with recent enough glibc, using "struct dirent" directly will be enough, as in my patch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
