https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68615
--- Comment #16 from [email protected] --- (In reply to comment #12) > Well since you use Windows you have a 32bit build and can't use more than > 4GB anyway. So a change in how we allocate memory might easily result in a > std::bad_alloc now. Whereas my 64bit Linux build will show no issues and > happily use more memory. > > Debugging why we might need more memory now is quite difficult and not a > real regression. Changes in the memory allocation are normal and such big > files are always a problem. I can't promise that we can fix it in the near > future as we are working hard on the calc core at the moment. > > The next version might already improve the situation when more of the work > has been merged. So my questions are: Do you plan a 64bit-version of LibreOffice for Windows for resolving memory-issues? Why is the memory-management of LO 4.0.x better (more stable) than for 4.1.x (for Windows)? For me this bug is a real regression of version 4.1.x related to 4.0.x (I have to use a portable 4.0.x-version parallely to the normal installed 4.1.x). How can I cleanup/shrink the ODS-file for loadability with LO 4.1.x? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
