https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62656
--- Comment #15 from [email protected] --- "Word 2011 for OSX" Ahhh, sorry. Alex had three comments, he already said what version of Word he tried. Not too surprisingly, Microsoft did not give their best effort on the OSX port... but it is somewhat surprising that Adobe didn't test on OSX, given their historical focus on integrating well with Apple. Here from 2011 is a possible-probable duplicate: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39179 A guy named Pierre was working on that bug here: http://www.lanedo.com/2013/quest-for-libreoffice-speed/ His conclusion was that footnotes are incredibly computationally expensive for openoffice, which makes sense -- the 600-page docx which is the subject of this article is some kind of biomed stuff about tuberculosis, with hundreds or even thousands of footnotes. Pierre suggests the trouble might be in this file: http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/writerfilter/source/ooxml/OOXMLDocumentImpl.cxx#161 p.s. What other tools are useful for performance-profiling the FILEOPEN sequence, besides the stuff Pierre mentioned? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
