https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69650
Jorendc <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OS|All |Windows (All) Status|NEEDINFO |NEW --- Comment #6 from Jorendc <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #4) > Hi Adam, LibreOffice it is not a MSoffice clone. Sure :) > Seems that MS is not trying to facilitate the use of their files by other > applications, and as I have read even between MSOffice versions not all > looks equal. Correct > I think a lot of things can make this difference, algorithms to generate the > view sure are not equals, (MS it is not open source), when LibreOffice open > docx files the parameters needs to be translated to the LibreOffice > parameters and maybe not all have a direct equivalent. Ideally we should fine-tune our equivalent parameters so all documents looks the same in LibreOffice as well as Word (which a docx document is most probably created in). True about the fact sometimes not all documents are rendered the same in different M$ Office products, but in this case I can confirm it renders the same way as the screenshot of Adam (used Mac OSX 10.8.5 with Word for Mac 2011). > On other hand, why is right in Word?, maybe is your personal assumption, > e.g. I have not MSOffice. And if you want every one can see exactly the > same, I think better use pdf files to distribute. Yes, for distribution, but not for editing purpose. With that 'mentality' we should kill the docx import filter, because "you should use pdf for distribution". :) > Changing the Pair Kerning in Character format to Expanded 0,1 seems fine (or > in defined Paragraph style). > > Please, do not set as New your reported bugs, the proper is someone, after > verify the bug, doing it. Very correct :)... unless the reporter is a known developer. You are right about the fact this isn't a "rule", but this is an "unwritten assumption" ("rule" is a wrong word :p) in our QA-system. I told Adam, who is a known developer in our community, in other bugs report he can mark mark his own bugs as NEW > In any case, more than a bug it should be a request for enhancement. Mmh, hard one :). But yes, maybe enhancement request. Okay, after all: I _FAIL_ to reproduce this using Mac OSX 10.8.5 with LibreOffice version: 4.1.2.3 Build ID: 40b2d7fde7e8d2d7bc5a449dc65df4d08a7dd38 Document is rendered same way as in Word (screenshot Adam) and Word for Mac 2011. But, nevertheless indisputable reproducible on Windows (screenshot Adam, known developer) -> NEW right away I can't test on master 4.2.0.0 right now, there are no tinderbox builds for Mac OSX. @Mariosv: I hope you agree :)? Kind regards, Joren -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
