https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46833

Björn Michaelsen <bjoern.michael...@canonical.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |NEEDINFO

--- Comment #5 from Björn Michaelsen <bjoern.michael...@canonical.com> ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> That only contains RPMs.
> I was asking for a static build in a tar archive (portable app -- for Linux,
> similar to a way Gentoo devs have provided for libreoffice-bin, for both QT
> and GTK).
Could you clarify exactly: Do you want to have dailies generated as tarballs
instead of as RPMs? Note that you can rather trivially generate tarballs from
RPMs.

Also this has been discussed on the ESC (actually I was proposing to have
tarballs instead, to lower expectations on system integration provided by
upstream builds and allow more universal distro-independant usage). So far it
has been rejected (see ESC minutes for details).


> Also I'll be really useful to have a QT build since a _lot_ of bugs are QT
> related.

Dailies are created from the tinderboxes. If you want to have a concrete build
done different, you can notify the tinderbox maintainer or set up a new
tinderbox:
 https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Tinderbox

Finally, let me point you to bibisect, which might also provide what you are
looking for:
 https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Bibisect

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

Reply via email to