https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70504
--- Comment #2 from Dominique Boutry <[email protected]> --- I manage to use the Find/Replace, with the following in head : - Herebelow is the concordance between the wording in the Format dialog and the resulting label under the "Search" and the "Replace by" fields in the S&R dialog : Normal Non italique, normal Italique Italique, normal Gras gras Italique Gras Italique, gras Pas de Gras normal Pas de Italique Non italique - for a typographical reason I don't know about, "Normal" is to be understood as "not Bold" - The "," is an operator AND ("Italique, normal" means "Italique AND Not Bold" - on multi-letters words or string, there is an AND operator between the letters ("abc" non Italique means No italique at all in the texte/string, no matter the bold attribute), - A full coverage of the cases could have been to add "Italique" (alone) and "Non italique, Gras". I agree that it is rather complex, hard to learn. Classical pitfalls are to forget erasing the formats, or to give to the "Search" field the format intended for the "Replace" field (and vice versa) This said, I have the following failure. In a new text, type x then Edit > S&R, searching for x without any format nor the "whole word only" set : - it fails to find it - select the x, set bold, reset bold, set italics, reset italics, set underline, reset underline, then reiterate the search : it works - select the X, Ctrl-m to erase the direct formatting, then reiterate the search : it fails, - reiterate the 3 set/reset then the search : it works. In my analysis, Writer is confused by the remains of former direct formatting (cf. bug 70608). So I confirm that there is a bug hereabout. I think that the behavior you exhibit in your Comment 1 is another bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
