https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65380
--- Comment #7 from Owen Genat <[email protected]> --- Created attachment 89006 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=89006&action=edit ZIP containing screenshot showing display under various LO versions. This probably constitutes confirmation, in that I am seeing the same on-screen appearance indicated in the screenshot provided in comment #6. This problem however is possibly more complex and likely older than currently indicated. I have tested the file provided in comment #4 by opening it on a single computer under Crunchbang 11 x86_64 linux running these versions of LO: - v3.3.4.1 OOO330m19 (Build:401) - v3.4.6.2 OOO340m1 (Build:602) - v3.5.7.2 Build ID: 3215f89-f603614-ab984f2-7348103-1225a5b - v3.6.7.2 Build ID: e183d5b - v4.0.6.2 Build ID: 2e2573268451a50806fcd60ae2d9fe01dd0ce24 - v4.1.3.2 Build ID: 70feb7d99726f064edab4605a8ab840c50ec57a Screenshots of the results are attached and differ from that indicated in the description and comments 4 and 5. All versions of LO apart from v3.3.4.1 exhibit problems in display of the text set in Adobe Garamond. Both v3.3.4.1 and v4.1.3.2 exhibit the same line height metric, so there has evidently been an improvement in this area in the latest release. The mis-interpretation of glyphs across all later versions seems identical, with the exception that certain uppercase glyphs (FGHJKPQU) are no longer represented using a rectangle outline under v4.x. It is worth noting that if Adobe Garamond Pro fonts (refer comment #1) are installed on the same system, the Pro series fonts will cause the text to display as expected (regardless of whether the provided Adobe Garamond Expert series fonts are installed or not). It would therefore seem important any testing be done on a system where the ONLY Garamond fonts are those provided in the description. To add to what I stated in comment #1, if only the Regular font (padr8a.pfb) is installed then all versions tested here display the example document as expected. If the Regular and Regular Expert fonts (padr8a.pfb, padr8x.pfb) are installed then only v3.3.4.1, v4.0.6.2, and v4.1.3.2 display the text as expected. The same pattern occurs for the Bold+Expert, BoldItalic+Expert, RegularItalic+Expert, SemiBold+Expert, and SemiBoldItalic+Expert combinations with varying degrees of glyph mis-interpretation. I have not exhaustively tested every possible combination for all the provided fonts, and this would seem unnecessary. The good news is that there appears to be some mild improvement under the v4.x series. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
